Monday, May 2, 2011

history

Making a generalizing stament like that takes away the integrity of her argument. just because a "winner" writes history does not make what he wrote false or less integrible. when a piece of history is written by a winner it doesn't mean that it is wrong. it just means that the event is told more in their point of view. the integrity of the story is still there, all of the events are the same they are just shown through a certain persons side. history books weren't just written by one person who was a winner. those accounts were from multiple different people who all experienced the same thing. just because the winners write the history doesn't mean they can write what ever they want in them. the facts in the history books are true and there is ample evidence to prove it. we need to learn about our past so we do not make the same mistakes we have made in the past, like slavery or genocide. so this is why history matters even if it has been written by the winners...

Friday, April 22, 2011

socialism

sociolisim does not work as a government because people want personal ownership. ever since the first cave man picked up a rock and said "mine'. there has been personal ownership. just because somone has worked hard for their money does not give the government the right to take it away and give it to others. it makes no sense that a doctor who has gone through seven years of college and medical school and has tried his hardest to excelle in life, makes as much money as a street sweeper with little to no education. there is nothing wrong with a poor begger who does not try to even work but just beggs. its ok that he is poor its his choice. it is not ok to give him money from the rich hard working doctor, for doing nothing. this just proves that socilistic governments do not work.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

economics

mr. Moore goes on to to compare democracy is socialistic which is not true. he also states that Christianity and other great religions are socialistic. he also goes onto say that religions are based off f marxist views to. this is both right and wrong. it is right in the way that the rich should give to the poor and not take from the poor and everyone should be equal. it is wrong though in the way that the money is obtained, and how they persuade us to believe this. in the bible it tells us that we should give offer a certain percent of our money to the church. it also does not make the rich seem bad as long as they are not greedy or sinful with it. well the marxist way is much different. they kill anyone who trys to have private ownership. you either fallow their rules or die. with christianity we do not have to give up everything for our government but with Marxisim you have to. thats why what he said is a false statement

Thursday, March 24, 2011

it takes 2 to govern

global secular government. first off the problam with a global secular government is that we are not all the same person. we are all diffrent people. a global secular humanistic government would be bad because it would demand for us all to work together and this would cause a state of chaos becasue we are not the same type of person. the other reason is that politics is only around because of tension between one another between diffrent views and reliogions. there will always be this tension so there will always be politics. but if everyone was secular then there would not be any religions or diffrent political views, thus defeating the purpose for a government. you need two governments to have functional politics... it may sound blunt but to have one funtioning rulling government you need at least need a funtioning controdicting political view thats why a universal secular government would not work and is flawed

Monday, March 21, 2011

abort-shun

Teenagers who become mothers have grim prospects for the future. They are much more likely to leave of school; receive inadequate prenatal care; rely on public assistance to raise a child; develop health problems; or end up divorced. this is an unfortunate reality for most all of these women. they really do reap what they sow. they have a grim future because they go into motherhood un prepared and inexperienced. they never expect to become pregnant so they never take the precautions that they should. when they do though they are like a deer in the head lights. meaning they don't know what the heck to do and either get a job and neglect their school and child or care for the child and fail out of school or just give up on all of it. they eventually become everyones problem when they go onto well-fair and receive our money that we have worked for to earn. the children of these mothers do not develop like a child does who has a father. the sad fact is that usually less then 25% of these women get married, meaning no Papa... this puts all of the financial burdens on the mother. this takes the mother away from the child preventing the very important developmental part of raising a child. the fact that the mother caries this burden now also means that the mother might or will probably start to show resentment towards the child for taking away her dreams and life. this can cause unbelievable psychological damage for a young child. i can kind of relate to this topic. I do NOT have a child but my cousin has 5 illigetiment children now and she is only 28 years old. my grandparents were left to take care of them and she still parties and hasn't learned from any of this. she has been divorced 3 times and still jumps from guy to guy. i believe that sex should wait until after marriage because by then you will have a somewhat stable relationship at least and you will know what you are getting yourself into. this is why teenage women who get pregnant will most likely live a grim life.

Monday, March 14, 2011

jerimiah is telling us that we shoulld bring together non believers and bring justice by showing everyone God's mercy and love for us. CLS tries to lift up everyone using the values demonstrated with postmodernism. CLS is kind of a selfish idea in which that the only purpose for it is to enrich itself until it is perfect. so like take for instance equality. this idea has both good and bad outcomes to it. equality between men and women are good. equality between races and ethnicities is a very good thing so there is no discrimination. there is also a bad side to this. the right for women to choose wether they are aloud to abort a 6 month old baby is a bad thing. it also brings for sexual oreintation freedoms so homosexual have the freedom to choose if they want to be gay. these people are the selfish type of people who only think of themselves and how they can only improve themselves. even though in the deutoronomy section it states that we should not be supresed by our selfs but we should fallow god's law. abortion and homosexuals are not described in any of this we are the the opposite. we are selfless beings. God placed us on earth under his authority to fallow his word, the bible. god shows us what is good and pure in the section of michia. God later says that all sinners or people who disobey the law wll be punished in james.

Friday, March 4, 2011

law 3

christians believe god as the alpha and the omega, the person who made us and was always here. christians believe that if we believe in God and devote our lives in enriching the world in his glory then we are guarantied access to heaven. Islamic Shari'a law offer two ways to their heaven called paradise. you either fallow the pillars made by muhammad in the Qur'an and if your good deeds out weigh your bad deeds then you gain access to paradise. the other option is you declare gihad ad kill your self and others for Muhammad. this gets you a fast past to paradise. a difference between the two religions is that with christianity there is individualism and with islam there really isn't. with Islam there is little to no equality for women. its basically like this for every one women is worth half as much as one man. with islam their god really does not ever revile himself. muslims do not consider them selves fallen either or sinful from birth, like christians do. muslims don't really hold many values for freedom of speech or religion or equality so they really are not able to have a democracy nor republic. muslims god allah is not a mercifuly god to them unlike christians. Jesus or lord is capable of forgiving and loving us